不同防火保护措施对电缆耐火性能的影响
Effects of Different Fire Protection Measures on Fire Resistance Performance of Cables
-
摘要: 针对在役电缆快速耐火升级需求,文中研制了涂覆式电缆包覆材料和无机膨胀层复合材料,并对比无防护电缆、电缆防火涂料,以及防火护套、涂覆式电缆包覆材料和无机膨胀层复合材料等防火保护措施的耐火性能。其中,无机膨胀层复合材料的烟密度等级为0.4,热释放速率峰值为5.8 kW·m–2,烟释放峰值为0.002 m2·s–1,燃烧增长速率指数为0.58 W·s–1。在耐火试验中,由于无机膨胀层复合材料的隔热保护,无机膨胀层复合材料耐火电缆的耐火时间长达
15290 s,分别是防火涂料电缆和涂覆式耐火电缆的2.6倍和2.2倍,实现了对既有电缆的耐火改造。Abstract: In response to the demand for rapid fire-resistant upgrading of in-service cables, a coated cable cladding material and an inorganic intumescent layer composite were successfully developed. Flame retardant properties of unprotected cable, cable fireproof coating, as well as fireproof sheath, coated cable cladding material, and inorganic intumescent layer composite material and other fire protection measures were compared. For inorganic intumescent layer composite, the smoke density rating was 0.4, the peak heat release rate was 5.8 kW·m−2, the peak smoke release rate was 0.002 m2·s−1, and the combustion growth rate index value was 0.58 W·s−1. In fire resistance test, due to the thermal insulation protection provided by inorganic intumescent layer composite material, the fire-resistant time of composite cables reached15290 s, which was 2.6 times that of cables with fireproof coating and 2.2 times that of coated fire-resistant cables, achieving fire-resistant retrofitting of existing cables.
©上海电缆研究所有限公司《电线电缆》编辑部版权所有,未经授权不得转载、改编。

下载: