A级不燃电缆与阻燃A类电缆的核心差异与选型应用辨析
Analysis of the Core Differences and Selection Applications between Class A Non-Combustible Cables and Flame-Retardant Class A Cables
-
摘要: 为辨析A级不燃电缆与阻燃A类电缆的核心差异并为工程选型提供指导,本文通过对比分析两者在结构设计、产品与试验标准及适用场所等方面的异同,明确了其防火性能的不同侧重点:A级不燃电缆要求材料总热值不高于2.0 MJ·kg−1,侧重于在火灾中维持线路完整性与功能性;阻燃A类电缆则要求成束燃烧时炭化高度不高于2.5 m,侧重于抑制火焰垂直蔓延。结论表明,电缆选型应依据项目标准、场所火灾风险、人员密集度及规范要求综合确定,A级不燃电缆适用于消防及安全关键系统等极高风险场所,阻燃A类电缆适用于高火灾风险及人员密集区域的主干线路。Abstract: To clarify the core differences between Class A non-combustible cables and flame-retardant Class A cables and to provide guidance for engineering selection, a comparative analysis of their structural design, product and test standards, and application sites was conducted. The results indicated their distinct emphases on fire performance: Class A non-combustible cables, requiring a total heat value of materials below 2.0 MJ·kg−1, concentrate on maintaining circuit integrity and functionality during fire; flame-retardant Class A cables, requiring a charring height below 2.5 m in bunched burning tests, concentrate on inhibiting vertical flame spread. It was concluded that cable selection should be based on project standards, site fire risk, occupant density, and code requirements. Class A non-combustible cables are suitable for extremely high-risk scenarios such as fire protection and safety-critical systems, while flame-retardant Class A cables are applicable for main circuits in areas with high fire risk and high occupant density.
©上海电缆研究所有限公司《电线电缆》编辑部版权所有,未经授权不得转载、改编。

下载: